National Professional Qualifications (NPQs): call for evidence

Closed 16 May 2025

Opened 27 Mar 2025

Feedback updated 10 Jul 2025

We asked

This call for evidence asked respondents to submit research that may inform updates to the evidence-base underpinning 3 NPQ frameworks.

You said

The department received 159 individual submission responses. The 159 submission responses included 200+ different insights, which included a range of evidence studies and other sources of information. The department is appreciative and thankful to all individuals and organisations who took the time to formally respond and submit research for consideration. 

We did

Please read the response document included on gov.uk for further information about the evidence that was received and the next steps for its use.

The department is now working closely with EEF and external experts to review the evidence and inform decision making when updating the frameworks. The department is openly engaging in multiple forums to ensure a wide range of views are considered when reviewing and updating the NPQ suite.

If you have any insights to share, or would like further information on potential opportunities for engagement, please contact npq.insights@education.gov.uk.

Overview

We are seeking recent, relevant and high-quality research that may inform updates to the evidence-base underpinning 3 NPQ frameworks.  

This call for evidence is seeking research that may inform changes to the following frameworks only: Headship (NPQH), Senior Leadership (NPQSL) and Executive Leadership (NPQEL).

Please read and refer back to the guidance included at the bottom of this page when completing the survey to submit evidence. 

Why your views matter

This is an evidence gathering exercise. This call for evidence is one part of the process to formally review the NPQs, which aims to ensure they are based on the best available evidence and best-practice of teaching and leadership in education.  

What happens next

Once the call for evidence has closed, the department will publish a response with information about the evidence that was received and the next steps for its use. The department will launch a separate call for evidence in Autumn/Winter 2025 for the remaining NPQs. 

Evidence submitted will be considered by the department and the Education Endowment Foundation. The frameworks will be independently reviewed and quality assured by the EEF to ensure they draw on the best available evidence and that this evidence has been interpreted with fidelity. Final decisions about amendments to the frameworks will be taken by the department. 

Audiences

  • Teachers
  • Headteachers
  • Governors
  • Training providers
  • Local authorities
  • Adult education providers
  • Further education colleges
  • Sixth form colleges
  • Independent specialist colleges
  • Designated safeguarding leads
  • SENCOs
  • Educational Psychologists
  • School business managers
  • Governing bodies and academy trusts
  • Bodies representing schools and local authorities
  • Unions and representative organisations
  • Government bodies and departments
  • Those researching children’s social care or education systems, with links to educational outcomes of Children in Need
  • Academies (including free schools), voluntary aided schools, voluntary controlled schools, foundation schools and community schools
  • Universities
  • Higher Education leaders and workforce
  • Further Education leaders and workforce
  • Higher Education governing bodies

Interests

  • Education
  • Sufficiency
  • Academies
  • Admissions
  • Establishing maintained schools
  • Governance
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Intervention
  • Planning
  • Pupil data
  • Statutory policies and guidance
  • Travel to school and colleges
  • Keeping children safe in education and other settings
  • Preventing neglect, abuse and exploitation
  • Safeguarding disabled children
  • Social workers' standards
  • Alternative provision
  • Attendance and absence
  • Behaviour and discipline
  • Pay, conditions and pensions
  • Recruitment
  • Teachers' standards
  • Training and development
  • Capital funding
  • Financial management
  • Procurement for schools
  • School and academy funding
  • School funding reform
  • SEND code of practice
  • Teaching and learning (SEND)
  • Equality
  • Teacher assessment
  • Primary assessment
  • Accountability