Modelling the costs and benefits of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE): information request
Overview
Please use this page to answer the questions in the information request and provide feedback.
Responses are optional. You do not have to answer all questions, so please feel free to skip those where you do not have an answer, or you would prefer not to answer.
Why your views matter
We set out at a high level, in the technical document, the latest behavioural and impact assumptions we are using in our modelling of LLE.
We would welcome views and feedback from all, but particularly providers offering L4-6 courses, employers and sector bodies, about the reasonableness and appropriateness of these assumptions as well as information on new research, evidence, or sector intelligence that we can use to refine our modelling.
How we will use your information
Responses will be processed internally and collated to improve the cost-benefit modelling for the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE). A fuller cost-benefit analysis will be published in due course.
What happens next
Responses will be processed internally and collated to improve the cost-benefit modelling for the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE). A fuller cost-benefit analysis will be published in due course.
Audiences
- 16-18 year old students resident at these institutions
- Academies (including free schools), voluntary aided schools, voluntary controlled schools, foundation schools and community schools
- Adoptive parents
- Adult and mental health practitioners
- Adult education providers
- All
- Bodies representing schools and local authorities
- CAMHS
- Clinical commissioning groups
- Community representatives
- Contractors involved in building schools
- Designated institutions and 16-19 academies
- Designated safeguarding leads
- Directors of children's services
- Early learning and childcare providers
- Educational Psychologists
- Employers
- Faith bodies
- Film Industry representatives
- Fire sector
- Foster carers
- Further education colleges
- Governing bodies and academy trusts
- Government bodies and departments
- Governors
- Headteachers
- Health visitors
- Independent specialist colleges
- Local authorities
- Parents
- Principle social workers
- Pupils
- School business managers
- School nurses
- School support staff
- SENCOs
- Service managers
- Sixth form colleges
- Social workers
- Social workers
- Teachers
- Team managers
- Those evaluating programmes for children in need
- Those involved in underlying theoretical research on abuse and neglect, child development etc
- Those researching children’s social care or education systems, with links to educational outcomes of Children in Need
- Training providers
- Unions and representative organisations
- Universities
- Virtual school heads
- Volunteers
- Young people
Interests
- Adult social care
- Adult social work
- Apprenticeships
- Behaviour and discipline
- Community learning
- Equality
- Film Industry and skills
- Governance
- HE
- Intervention
- Lifelong learning
- Post-16 funding
- Raising the participation age
- Work based training
Share
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook